The data used to measure the evolution of mobility in France in the long run, focusing on intergenerational inertia, do not yield a clear consensus either. These results owing to the difficulties inherent in this comparative analysis, however, must be used with caution. In addition, children whose parents have a high income are less likely to have a high income in France than in these two other countries. However, the same study shows that children from modest backgrounds in France are more likely to reach a high income level than in the United States and Germany. ![]() The OECD work concludes that France ranks among the low-mobility countries, with an income inertia of fifty-two per cent across generations, compared with less than forty per cent for OECD countries. The heterogeneity of data in different countries, together with the fact that parental incomes are not directly observed in French surveys makes this comparison difficult. In multiple studies, France appears to be a country with an 'intermediate' level of mobility (Lefranc and Trannoy, 2005), 'low' and lower than the United States (OECD, 2018) or 'high' and comparable to Sweden (Alesina et al. There is no consensus today about the relative position of France compared with other countries for intergenerational income mobility. ![]() ![]() Does France, where inequality seems to be more under control than elsewhere, have a specific problem of low mobility from one generation to the next?īox 1 – Intergenerational income mobility in France : main results Still, the number of studies on this issue is growing rapidly, as attested by the publication in 2018 of the OECD's report «Is the Social Ladder broken? How can Social Mobility be promoted? » In this assessment, France scored badly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |